President Trump Signals Decision on Next Federal Reserve Chair at Davos Forum

This analysis is based on President Donald Trump’s announcement at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on January 21, 2026, indicating he has made a decision on the next Federal Reserve chair, stating he is “down to maybe one in my mind” [1][2]. The announcement identified four finalists—Kevin Hassett, Christopher Waller, Kevin Warsh, and Rick Rieder—while markets exhibited significant volatility amid uncertainty surrounding the appointment [1][3]. This high-impact event carries substantial implications for monetary policy trajectory, interest rate expectations, and broader market sentiment as the appointment would extend into the next presidential administration [1].

President Trump’s disclosure at the Davos press conference represents a significant development in one of the most consequential economic appointments a U.S. president can make. The timing of this announcement—occurring alongside critical legal proceedings—underscores the multifaceted nature of Fed leadership selection [1][4]. Trump indicated he would be announcing the new Fed chairman “in the not too distant future” and noted that the individual selected “will do a very good job,” while cryptically stating “I gave away some of it,” suggesting hints about his preference may have been embedded in his remarks [1][2].

The four finalists represent diverse backgrounds within economic policy and financial markets. Kevin Hassett currently serves as White House economic adviser, bringing direct administration experience to consideration. Christopher Waller, as a current Federal Reserve Governor, offers institutional continuity and deep understanding of Fed operations. Kevin Warsh previously served as a Fed Governor from 2006 to 2011, providing prior central banking experience. Rick Rieder, serving as BlackRock’s chief investment officer, brings extensive private sector financial expertise and market perspective [1][3]. Trump had previously expressed support for Scott Bessent but noted “Scott only wants to stay where he is,” effectively removing him from consideration [2].

The Fed chair announcement occurs against a backdrop of significant legal challenges affecting the central bank’s institutional framework. The Supreme Court is currently hearing oral arguments in Cook v. Trump, a case examining the presidential power to remove Fed governors [4]. This proceeding carries profound implications for Fed independence, potentially reshaping the balance between executive authority and monetary policy autonomy that has characterized the American central banking system since its modern reform in 1977.

Simultaneously, a Department of Justice probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell regarding $2.5 billion in headquarters renovation costs adds another layer of complexity to the leadership transition [5]. Some Republican senators have expressed opposition to certain candidates in light of these developments, suggesting potential confirmation challenges regardless of Trump’s selection [5]. These concurrent legal proceedings create an unprecedented environment of institutional uncertainty surrounding the Fed’s governance structure and operational independence.

Market data reveals pronounced volatility in response to the evolving Fed leadership situation [0]. The S&P 500 recorded a decline of 1.00% on January 20 before rebounding with a 0.95% gain on January 21. The NASDAQ showed similar patterns, dropping 0.81% on January 20 before advancing 0.88% on January 21. The Dow Jones Industrial Average experienced a 1.05% decline followed by a 1.08% increase, while the Russell 2000 demonstrated relative resilience with a 0.48% gain on January 20 followed by a 1.19% advance on January 21 [0].

This volatility pattern indicates that market participants are actively processing and repricing information related to potential Fed leadership changes and their implications for monetary policy. The intraday swings reflect uncertainty regarding the eventual nominee and the policy direction they might pursue, particularly given Trump’s repeated criticism of current Chair Powell for not lowering interest rates sufficiently rapidly [1].

Trump’s observation that Fed chair candidates “are great until they get the job” reveals important insights into the selection process and potential challenges facing the eventual nominee [1]. This comment suggests the president recognizes that the institutional pressures and constraints of the Fed chair position may transform candidate perspectives, potentially complicating expectations about policy outcomes. The statement also implies awareness that maintaining Fed independence—despite executive branch preferences—remains a structural feature of the role regardless of who occupies the chair.

The selection of a Fed chair during Trump’s second term carries particular significance given the constitutional context. With Trump’s term extending through January 2029, this appointment would extend beyond his presidency, creating a legacy appointment that shapes monetary policy into the subsequent administration. This temporal dimension elevates the importance of selecting an individual whose approach to policy aligns with Trump’s economic priorities while maintaining sufficient institutional credibility to navigate Senate confirmation and market acceptance.

The concurrent Supreme Court case and DOJ investigation create a complex environment for Fed governance that extends beyond the individual appointment. The Cook v. Trump case specifically addresses whether the president possesses authority to remove Fed governors at will, potentially undermining the independence that has been central to Fed effectiveness since the 1977 Humphrey-Hawkins Act [4]. A ruling expanding presidential removal power could fundamentally alter the Fed’s operational independence, affecting how markets interpret Fed communications and policy decisions regardless of who serves as chair.

The DOJ probe into Powell adds another dimension of institutional tension, raising questions about the appropriateness of using law enforcement mechanisms to pressure monetary policy decisions. Some Republican senators’ opposition to candidates based on these developments suggests that confirmation proceedings will likely include substantial scrutiny of the administration’s approach to Fed independence and governance [5].

The analysis reveals several risk considerations warranting attention from market participants. Leadership uncertainty remains elevated despite Trump’s announcement, as the specific nominee and confirmation timeline carry inherent execution risk. The Supreme Court’s pending ruling in Cook v. Trump could substantially alter the institutional framework governing Fed operations, introducing policy uncertainty that markets may need to price in [4]. The DOJ probe developments introduce additional unpredictability into the leadership transition process, potentially affecting confirmation prospects for Trump’s preferred candidate.

Policy transition risk represents another consideration, as any leadership change during an ongoing economic cycle creates uncertainty about monetary policy trajectory. Markets have historically exhibited sensitivity to Fed chair transitions, particularly when the incoming chair’s policy preferences differ significantly from the incumbent. The interplay between Trump’s expressed desire for lower interest rates and the institutional constraints on monetary policy independence creates potential for policy disappointment or market volatility.

The market volatility associated with the Fed announcement creates potential opportunities for investors with appropriate risk tolerance and time horizons. The identification of four credible candidates allows for preliminary assessment of potential policy implications associated with each finalist—Waller representing institutional continuity, Hassett offering direct policy coordination experience, Warsh providing prior Fed governance knowledge, and Rieder contributing extensive market perspective [1][3]. Early positioning based on candidate assessment may provide advantage as information becomes available.

The ongoing legal proceedings also present opportunity for those positioned to benefit from clarity regarding institutional governance. A Supreme Court ruling that definitively establishes Fed independence boundaries could reduce uncertainty premium in rate-sensitive assets, potentially benefiting bonds and rate-sensitive equities. Conversely, a ruling expanding executive authority could create different opportunity sets focused on sectors expected to benefit from closer monetary policy coordination with administration priorities.

The following critical data points emerge from the integrated analysis:

President Trump has narrowed his Fed chair consideration to four finalists—Kevin Hassett (White House economic adviser), Christopher Waller (current Fed Governor), Kevin Warsh (former Fed Governor 2006-2011), and Rick Rieder (BlackRock chief investment officer) [1][3]. Trump indicated being “down to maybe one in my mind” and suggested hints about his preference were embedded in his Davos remarks [1][2].

Trump stated the formal announcement would come “in the not too distant future,” though no specific date has been confirmed. The appointment would extend through Trump’s term ending January 2029, making it a legacy appointment [1].

U.S. equity markets exhibited significant day-to-day volatility, with major indices declining approximately 1% on January 20 before recovering similar gains on January 21 [0]. This pattern reflects active market processing of Fed leadership uncertainty.

The Supreme Court is hearing Cook v. Trump regarding presidential removal power over Fed governors, while a DOJ probe examines Fed Chair Powell regarding renovation costs [4][5]. These proceedings create institutional uncertainty that may influence confirmation dynamics.

Trump has renewed criticism of current Chair Powell for insufficiently rapid interest rate reductions, while noting that Scott Bessent preferred to remain in his current role [1][2]. The selected candidate’s approach to rate policy remains a key unknown factor.

---

[0] Ginlix Analytical Database – Market Indices Data

[1] U.S. News – “Trump Says Fed Chair Candidates Are Great, Until They Get The Job” (https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2026-01-21/trump-says-fed-chair-candidates-are-great-until-they-get-the-job)

[2] CNBC – “Trump signals he has a favorite for Fed chair” (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/21/trump-signals-he-has-a-favorite-for-fed-chair-down-to-maybe-one-in-my-mind.html)

[3] CBS News – “Hurdles Trump faces in push for low interest rates” (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-interest-rates-federal-reserve-hurdles-jerome-powell-subpoena/)

[4] CNN – “Fed headed to court, independence at stake” (https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/21/economy/fed-lisa-cook-supreme-court)

[5] The Street – “White House signals shift in race to name next Fed chair” (https://www.thestreet.com/fed/white-house-signals-huge-shift-in-race-to-name-next-federal-reserve-chair)