Supreme Court Weighs Fed Independence: Lisa Cook Removal Case and DOJ Powell Probe

This analysis examines the January 21, 2026 Supreme Court oral arguments concerning President Trump’s attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, alongside the ongoing DOJ criminal investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell. The dual proceedings represent an unprecedented challenge to central bank independence and the constitutional separation of powers. Fox Business contributor Dagen McDowell stated on “The Big Money Show” that Powell should “get gone” and “has no future” [1]. The Court’s decisions in these matters will establish critical precedent regarding presidential authority over independent regulatory agencies and the structural autonomy of the Federal Reserve system.

---

The Supreme Court case centers on whether President Trump can bypass the “for cause” termination requirements established under the Federal Reserve Act when removing Governor Lisa Cook. Solicitor General John Sauer argued on behalf of the administration, asserting the president’s constitutional authority to remove executive branch officials at will [2][3]. Cook faces removal over uncharged mortgage fraud allegations, which she vigorously denies, raising fundamental questions about due process and the independence of monetary policy authorities.

The Court appeared skeptical of the administration’s position during oral arguments, with multiple justices expressing concern about the precedent such a ruling would establish [2][4]. A Trump victory in this case would fundamentally reshape the structure of independent regulatory agencies beyond the Federal Reserve, potentially subjecting other independent bodies to at-will presidential removal. The constitutional limits on presidential power over independent agencies have been established since the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor ruling, and this case represents the most significant challenge to that framework in decades.

The DOJ criminal investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell adds a parallel dimension of tension between the executive branch and the central bank [4][5]. Federal prosecutors have subpoenaed Powell, and the administration has threatened criminal indictment over alleged official misconduct. This represents an unprecedented situation in American history—no sitting Federal Reserve Chair has ever faced criminal investigation by the sitting administration that appointed them.

The Powell probe appears designed to pressure the Fed Chair into compliance with the administration’s policy preferences, particularly regarding interest rate decisions and regulatory approaches. Democratic senators have demanded records related to the Powell investigation, citing concerns about potential abuse of prosecutorial power for political ends [6]. The combination of the Cook removal effort and the Powell criminal investigation suggests a coordinated strategy to bring the independent Federal Reserve under direct executive control.

The potential restructuring of the Federal Reserve Board carries significant implications for monetary policy direction. If President Trump succeeds in removing Cook and appointing additional loyalists to the Board, the administration would have majority control over the Fed’s policy-making committee. This could result in more accommodative monetary policy, lower interest rates, and potentially higher inflation expectations.

Bond markets and currency markets have historically reacted negatively to concerns about central bank independence. The uncertainty surrounding these legal proceedings creates elevated volatility risk for financial markets. Investors should monitor Treasury yields, the U.S. dollar index, and Federal Reserve communication for signals about how markets are pricing these institutional risks.

---

The dual proceedings against Federal Reserve leadership represent the most significant assault on central bank independence in the modern era. The Federal Reserve’s autonomy from political pressure has been considered essential to its credibility in conducting monetary policy, as it allows the central bank to make difficult decisions—such as raising interest rates during inflationary periods—without fear of political retaliation. The Trump administration’s actions fundamentally challenge this institutional framework.

The DOJ criminal probe into Powell is particularly noteworthy because it creates a chilling effect beyond the immediate legal proceedings. Even if the investigation ultimately produces no charges, the mere existence of criminal scrutiny could influence Powell’s decision-making and willingness to resist administration pressure on monetary policy matters.

The Supreme Court’s apparent reluctance to endorse the administration’s position reflects awareness of the precedent-setting nature of this case [2][3]. A ruling allowing Cook’s removal would call into question the independence of all “for cause” removal protections across the regulatory state, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, and other independent agencies. This could fundamentally alter the balance of power between the executive branch and the regulatory apparatus established over the past century.

The constitutional arguments center on whether the President has inherent authority to remove any principal officer or whether Congress may condition removal on “good cause” for certain independent agency positions. The Court’s decision will likely turn on how it interprets the Take Care Clause and the separation of powers doctrine.

These proceedings highlight the increasing politicization of Federal Reserve appointments and operations. The Federal Reserve was designed to be insulated from day-to-day political pressures, but the current administration has made no secret of its desire to reshape the institution to align with its economic priorities. The confirmation process for recent Fed nominees was highly contentious, and the current legal proceedings extend that conflict into the judicial arena.

---

: The Court’s ultimate ruling remains uncertain despite apparent skepticism toward the administration’s position [2][3]. An adverse ruling could trigger significant market volatility as investors reassess the implications for monetary policy independence and institutional stability.

: If Cook is removed and the DOJ investigation forces Powell’s departure or resignation, the Federal Reserve Board would undergo dramatic transformation. This could lead to abrupt changes in monetary policy stance, affecting interest rate trajectories, inflation expectations, and financial conditions across the economy.

: The criminal investigation into Powell raises serious concerns about the weaponization of law enforcement for political purposes [4][5]. Even if the investigation is ultimately dismissed or fails to produce charges, the precedent of targeting a sitting Fed Chair creates long-term institutional risks.

: Elevated uncertainty surrounding central bank independence historically correlates with increased market volatility, wider bond yield spreads, and potential currency weakness. Traders and investors should prepare for elevated short-term volatility.

: If the Supreme Court rules against the administration, it could restore confidence in central bank independence and strengthen institutional norms. This could lead to more stable monetary policy expectations and reduced market uncertainty.

: The controversy may catalyze legislative efforts to strengthen Federal Reserve independence through statutory protections. This could create a more durable framework for central bank autonomy regardless of administrative priorities.

---

The Supreme Court’s January 21, 2026 hearing on the Lisa Cook removal case represents a pivotal moment for Federal Reserve independence and presidential removal power. The Court appeared reluctant to endorse the administration’s position, suggesting awareness of the precedent-setting implications [2][3][4]. Simultaneously, the DOJ criminal investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell creates unprecedented tension between the executive branch and the central bank [4][5].

The dual proceedings raise fundamental questions about constitutional separation of powers, the independence of regulatory agencies, and the institutional framework governing monetary policy in the United States. The outcome will likely define the boundaries of presidential authority over independent agencies for decades to come. Market participants should monitor developments closely, as the decisions will affect interest rate expectations, inflation outlooks, and overall financial market stability.

Democratic legislators have demanded records related to the Powell investigation, highlighting the political stakes involved [6]. The situation remains fluid, with the Supreme Court expected to issue rulings within weeks and the DOJ investigation continuing to develop. The long-term implications for Federal Reserve independence and institutional credibility remain significant concerns for policymakers, market participants, and constitutional scholars alike.

---

[1] Fox Business - ‘The Big Money Show’ - Dagen McDowell commentary on Powell
URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e7CBIIBNcE

[2] Reuters - “US Supreme Court appears reluctant to let Trump fire Fed’s Lisa Cook”
URL: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-considers-trumps-bid-fire-feds-lisa-cook-2026-01-21/

[3] CNBC - “Supreme Court case on Trump bid to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook set for oral arguments”
URL: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/21/supreme-court-trump-fed-lisa-cook-powell.html

[4] Al Jazeera - “US Supreme Court appears reluctant to let Trump fire Fed’s Lisa Cook”
URL: https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/1/21/us-supreme-court-appears-reluctant-to-let-trump-fire-feds-lisa-cook

[5] Washington Post - “Trump wants to get rid of the Fed chair — but a DOJ inquiry…”
URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/01/18/powell-trump-subpoena-fed-chair/

[6] Reuters - “Democratic senators demand records on Powell probe”
URL: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/democratic-senators-demand-records-powell-probe-wsj-reports-2026-01-20/